Kargo HiringEmail sending LIVE
Dashboard / Candidate

Aman Borkar

Placed in Senior Product Manager by best fit (no role stated; scored higher on this rubric) · 30_aman_borkar.pdf
Private: squad_6@pg27.mesaschool.co · +91 99014 28453
Applied-role score
24/100
#14 of 16 SPM applicants
PM score
21/100
SPM score
24/100
Current status
Analysed
Below shortlist (AI suggestion)
Your decision
1

Why they fit

No criterion reached a clear-evidence score (3/5 or higher) on the SPM rubric.

2

Where they fall short

  • Independent Decision Ownership −24 pts

    The CV shows indirect evidence through defining product strategy and roadmaps, but lacks any concrete example of independent, consequential decision ownership under uncertainty or incomplete information. No trade-offs or decision outcomes are articulated.

  • Evidence-Led Prioritisation and Reversal −16 pts

    The candidate references analyzing campaign metrics, user data, and UX friction points, providing indirect hints of using evidence. There is no evidence of prioritisation calls, stopping work, or reversing an earlier direction based on findings.

  • Problem -> Change -> Business/Operational Result −12 pts

    The candidate reports quantified outcomes such as improved engagement and retention linked to launch strategy and redesigns. However, the problem definition is completely missing, leaving only a partial narrative connecting an issue to the intervention and outcome.

3

Rubric breakdown: SPM

CriterionWeightScoreWeightedAI reasoningEvidence from CV
Independent Decision Ownership30% 1/56.0/30The CV shows indirect evidence through defining product strategy and roadmaps, but lacks any concrete example of independent, consequential decision ownership under uncertainty or incomplete information. No trade-offs or decision outcomes are articulated.
  • “Defined product strategy and roadmap for a growing streetwear e-commerce brand.”
Problem -> Change -> Business/Operational Result20% 2/58.0/20The candidate reports quantified outcomes such as improved engagement and retention linked to launch strategy and redesigns. However, the problem definition is completely missing, leaving only a partial narrative connecting an issue to the intervention and outcome.
  • “Increased online engagement by 30% through product launch strategy.”
  • “Improved user retention by 20% through UX redesign.”
Evidence-Led Prioritisation and Reversal20% 1/54.0/20The candidate references analyzing campaign metrics, user data, and UX friction points, providing indirect hints of using evidence. There is no evidence of prioritisation calls, stopping work, or reversing an earlier direction based on findings.
  • “Used Power BI dashboards to analyze campaign performance and pricing strategies.”
  • “Conducted UX research and usability testing to identify friction points.”
Creates Systems Others Run15% 1/53.0/15The CV mentions participating in sprint cycle management and maintaining design systems, which indicates working within existing processes. There is no evidence of conceiving and building an enduring operating system or framework that others independently run.
  • “Managed Agile sprint cycles using JIRA.”
  • “Maintained visual design systems aligned with client requirements.”
Multi-Party Resolution Under Pressure15% 1/53.0/15Delivering projects under strict deadlines indicates exposure to deadline pressure, but there is no evidence of resolving complex multi-party conflict, managing escalations, or navigating failures and post-mortems.
  • “Delivered 10+ global client projects under strict deadlines.”
  • “Presented product launch strategies and growth plans to stakeholders.”
Total100%24The candidate presents foundational experience across design and product execution with high-level outcome metrics. However, the CV provides minimal to no evidence across the SPM rubric requirements for independent consequential decision-making, evidence-led direction reversals, system building, or high-pressure multi-party resolution.
Scoring scale
  • 0: No evidence in the CV
  • 1: Indirect or participation-only evidence
  • 2: Partial: some elements of the description, weak link to outcome
  • 3: One clear example matching the description
  • 4: Clear example with a visible result, candidate's own action linked to it
  • 5: Repeated, strong examples fully matching the description, with results

Weighted contribution = score ÷ 5 × weight. Every quote is checked against the CV text; if none can be verified, the score is capped at 1.

4

Evidence

Verified CV quotes used (SPM rubric)
  • “Defined product strategy and roadmap for a growing streetwear e-commerce brand.” · Independent Decision Ownership
  • “Increased online engagement by 30% through product launch strategy.” · Problem -> Change -> Business/Operational Result
  • “Improved user retention by 20% through UX redesign.” · Problem -> Change -> Business/Operational Result
  • “Used Power BI dashboards to analyze campaign performance and pricing strategies.” · Evidence-Led Prioritisation and Reversal
  • “Conducted UX research and usability testing to identify friction points.” · Evidence-Led Prioritisation and Reversal
  • “Managed Agile sprint cycles using JIRA.” · Creates Systems Others Run
  • “Maintained visual design systems aligned with client requirements.” · Creates Systems Others Run
  • “Delivered 10+ global client projects under strict deadlines.” · Multi-Party Resolution Under Pressure
  • “Presented product launch strategies and growth plans to stakeholders.” · Multi-Party Resolution Under Pressure
Outcomes stated in the CV
  • Increased online engagement by 30% through product launch strategy.
  • Improved user retention by 20% through UX redesign.
  • Improved product UX by 25% through redesign initiatives.
  • Delivered 10+ global client projects under strict deadlines.
  • Built KPI dashboards using Tableau and Power BI.
  • Delivered multiple product features on schedule using Agile methodology.
Anonymised CV (exactly what the AI saw)
AI Product Manager
Pune, India | | |
LinkedIn: [PROFILE URL REDACTED]
Website: https://flowcv.me/
Portfolio: https:/www.behance.net/aniketborikar
Professional Summary
Product Manager with 3+ years of experience in GEN AI and Agentic AI product strategy,
UX design, and data analytics. Proven track record of launching digital products, improving
user engagement, and driving business growth through data-driven decision-making.
Experienced in Agile product development, stakeholder management, and cross-functional
team leadership.
Professional Experience
Product Manager – Mammoth Streetwear / Urban Homz (Jun 2024 – Present)
• Defined product strategy and roadmap for a growing streetwear e-commerce brand.
• Led cross-functional team of 10+ members across marketing, design, printing
operations, and development.
• Use of Multiple AI tools to make work refine and quick.
• Managed Agile sprint cycles using JIRA.
• Used Power BI dashboards to analyze campaign performance and pricing strategies.
• Presented product launch strategies and growth plans to stakeholders.
Data Analytics & UI/UX Designer – Fungro (Jul 2023 – Apr 2024)
• Analyzed user behavior data to improve usability and retention metrics.
• Built interactive dashboards using Tableau and SQL.
• Collaborated with product managers to align UX improvements with product goals.
• Delivered 10+ global client projects under strict deadlines.
UI/UX Designer – Webknot Technologies (Feb 2022 – May 2023)
• Designed wireframes, user flows, and prototypes using Figma and Adobe XD.
• Conducted UX research and usability testing to identify friction points.
• Improved product UX by 25% through redesign initiatives.
[CANDIDATE] BorkarAMAN [CANDIDATE]
[EMAIL REDACTED][PHONE REDACTED] [PHONE REDACTED]99014 2845[PHONE REDACTED] [CANDIDATE]-[CANDIDATE]-pm
[CANDIDATE]-[CANDIDATE]-pm
• Collaborated with developers to maintain design consistency.
Graphic Designer – AS Architect / Design Coordinator (Jan 2019 – Aug 2021)
• Created branding and marketing assets using Adobe Illustrator and Photoshop.
• Maintained visual design systems aligned with client requirements.
Education
PGDM – Product Management, Henry Harvin (Aug 2023 – Jun 2024)
Bachelor of Architecture (B.Arch), PIADS Nagpur (Jun 2015 – Jul 2020)
Certifications
• Agile Methodology & Scrum Master – Henry Harvin
• Six Sigma Green Belt
• Google UI/UX Design Certification
• UX Research & Design – University of Michigan
Skills
• Product Strategy, Agile & Scrum, Sprint Planning, Product Roadmapping
• Stakeholder Management, Cross-functional Leadership
• Figma, Adobe XD, Miro, InVision
• SQL, Tableau, Power BI, Marketing Analytics
• JIRA, Microsoft Office, Adobe Photoshop, Adobe Illustrator
Key Achievements
• Increased online engagement by 30% through product launch strategy.
• Improved user retention by 20% through UX redesign.
• Built KPI dashboards using Tableau and Power BI.
• Delivered multiple product features on schedule using Agile methodology.
Redacted: name ×6, email ×1, phone ×2, profile url ×1
5

Interview brief

Briefs are written when you shortlist a candidate.

6

Email draft

An offer or rejection draft is prepared once you make a decision. Nothing is ever sent without your approval.

Audit trail (3)
  • 9/29/2026, 11:37:02 AMsystemanalysis completed{"PM_score":21,"SPM_score":24}
  • 9/29/2026, 11:37:02 AMsystemrole assigned best fit{"role":"SPM","PM_score":21,"SPM_score":24}
  • 9/29/2026, 11:29:36 AMsystemcv ingested{"file":"30_aman_borkar.pdf","role":"AUTO","redactions":{"name":23,"email":1,"phone":2,"profile_url":1},"name_detected":true}