Aman Borkar
Why they fit
No criterion reached a clear-evidence score (3/5 or higher) on the SPM rubric.
Where they fall short
- Independent Decision Ownership −24 pts
The CV shows indirect evidence through defining product strategy and roadmaps, but lacks any concrete example of independent, consequential decision ownership under uncertainty or incomplete information. No trade-offs or decision outcomes are articulated.
- Evidence-Led Prioritisation and Reversal −16 pts
The candidate references analyzing campaign metrics, user data, and UX friction points, providing indirect hints of using evidence. There is no evidence of prioritisation calls, stopping work, or reversing an earlier direction based on findings.
- Problem -> Change -> Business/Operational Result −12 pts
The candidate reports quantified outcomes such as improved engagement and retention linked to launch strategy and redesigns. However, the problem definition is completely missing, leaving only a partial narrative connecting an issue to the intervention and outcome.
| Criterion | Weight | Score | Weighted | AI reasoning | Evidence from CV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Problem -> Change -> Result | 25% | 2/5 | 10.0/25 | The CV reports identifying friction points and executing redesign initiatives that resulted in retention and UX metric gains. However, it lacks specifics on the concrete problem identified, the exact change implemented, and how the candidate's actions directly drove the measured outcome. |
|
| Evidence-Led Decisions | 20% | 1/5 | 4.0/20 | The CV mentions analyzing user behavior data and campaign performance to guide strategies, but it provides only high-level claims rather than any concrete example of a decision being changed, prioritized, or stopped based on evidence. |
|
| Builds Repeatable Ways of Working | 20% | 1/5 | 4.0/20 | The candidate notes building KPI dashboards and maintaining design systems, which indicates indirect exposure to shared artifacts. However, there is no evidence of creating a framework, template, or operating method that other team members subsequently adopted. |
|
| Carries Ambiguous Problems Through to Closure | 20% | 0/5 | 0.0/20 | There is no evidence in the CV of taking an ambiguous or messy problem through cross-functional resolution, handling escalations, or conducting follow-up to closure. | Evidence not present in the CV. |
| Gets to the Source Before Designing the Fix | 15% | 1/5 | 3.0/15 | The CV mentions conducting UX research and usability testing, offering indirect evidence of direct user engagement. It does not provide a specific example demonstrating that product or process work changed as a result of firsthand discoveries. |
|
| Total | 100% | 21 | The candidate presents generic product and UX responsibilities along with high-level outcome metrics, but lacks detailed narrative examples across all rubric dimensions. There is minimal to no evidence of evidence-led decision tradeoffs, resolving ambiguous issues, or establishing repeatable practices adopted by others. | ||
Scoring scale
- 0: No evidence in the CV
- 1: Indirect or participation-only evidence
- 2: Partial: some elements of the description, weak link to outcome
- 3: One clear example matching the description
- 4: Clear example with a visible result, candidate's own action linked to it
- 5: Repeated, strong examples fully matching the description, with results
Weighted contribution = score ÷ 5 × weight. Every quote is checked against the CV text; if none can be verified, the score is capped at 1.
Evidence
- “Defined product strategy and roadmap for a growing streetwear e-commerce brand.” · Independent Decision Ownership
- “Increased online engagement by 30% through product launch strategy.” · Problem -> Change -> Business/Operational Result
- “Improved user retention by 20% through UX redesign.” · Problem -> Change -> Business/Operational Result
- “Used Power BI dashboards to analyze campaign performance and pricing strategies.” · Evidence-Led Prioritisation and Reversal
- “Conducted UX research and usability testing to identify friction points.” · Evidence-Led Prioritisation and Reversal
- “Managed Agile sprint cycles using JIRA.” · Creates Systems Others Run
- “Maintained visual design systems aligned with client requirements.” · Creates Systems Others Run
- “Delivered 10+ global client projects under strict deadlines.” · Multi-Party Resolution Under Pressure
- “Presented product launch strategies and growth plans to stakeholders.” · Multi-Party Resolution Under Pressure
- Increased online engagement by 30% through product launch strategy.
- Improved user retention by 20% through UX redesign.
- Improved product UX by 25% through redesign initiatives.
- Delivered 10+ global client projects under strict deadlines.
- Built KPI dashboards using Tableau and Power BI.
- Delivered multiple product features on schedule using Agile methodology.
Anonymised CV (exactly what the AI saw)
AI Product Manager Pune, India | | | LinkedIn: [PROFILE URL REDACTED] Website: https://flowcv.me/ Portfolio: https:/www.behance.net/aniketborikar Professional Summary Product Manager with 3+ years of experience in GEN AI and Agentic AI product strategy, UX design, and data analytics. Proven track record of launching digital products, improving user engagement, and driving business growth through data-driven decision-making. Experienced in Agile product development, stakeholder management, and cross-functional team leadership. Professional Experience Product Manager – Mammoth Streetwear / Urban Homz (Jun 2024 – Present) • Defined product strategy and roadmap for a growing streetwear e-commerce brand. • Led cross-functional team of 10+ members across marketing, design, printing operations, and development. • Use of Multiple AI tools to make work refine and quick. • Managed Agile sprint cycles using JIRA. • Used Power BI dashboards to analyze campaign performance and pricing strategies. • Presented product launch strategies and growth plans to stakeholders. Data Analytics & UI/UX Designer – Fungro (Jul 2023 – Apr 2024) • Analyzed user behavior data to improve usability and retention metrics. • Built interactive dashboards using Tableau and SQL. • Collaborated with product managers to align UX improvements with product goals. • Delivered 10+ global client projects under strict deadlines. UI/UX Designer – Webknot Technologies (Feb 2022 – May 2023) • Designed wireframes, user flows, and prototypes using Figma and Adobe XD. • Conducted UX research and usability testing to identify friction points. • Improved product UX by 25% through redesign initiatives. [CANDIDATE] BorkarAMAN [CANDIDATE] [EMAIL REDACTED][PHONE REDACTED] [PHONE REDACTED]99014 2845[PHONE REDACTED] [CANDIDATE]-[CANDIDATE]-pm [CANDIDATE]-[CANDIDATE]-pm • Collaborated with developers to maintain design consistency. Graphic Designer – AS Architect / Design Coordinator (Jan 2019 – Aug 2021) • Created branding and marketing assets using Adobe Illustrator and Photoshop. • Maintained visual design systems aligned with client requirements. Education PGDM – Product Management, Henry Harvin (Aug 2023 – Jun 2024) Bachelor of Architecture (B.Arch), PIADS Nagpur (Jun 2015 – Jul 2020) Certifications • Agile Methodology & Scrum Master – Henry Harvin • Six Sigma Green Belt • Google UI/UX Design Certification • UX Research & Design – University of Michigan Skills • Product Strategy, Agile & Scrum, Sprint Planning, Product Roadmapping • Stakeholder Management, Cross-functional Leadership • Figma, Adobe XD, Miro, InVision • SQL, Tableau, Power BI, Marketing Analytics • JIRA, Microsoft Office, Adobe Photoshop, Adobe Illustrator Key Achievements • Increased online engagement by 30% through product launch strategy. • Improved user retention by 20% through UX redesign. • Built KPI dashboards using Tableau and Power BI. • Delivered multiple product features on schedule using Agile methodology.
Interview brief
Briefs are written when you shortlist a candidate.
Email draft
An offer or rejection draft is prepared once you make a decision. Nothing is ever sent without your approval.
Audit trail (3)
- 9/29/2026, 11:37:02 AMsystemanalysis completed{"PM_score":21,"SPM_score":24}
- 9/29/2026, 11:37:02 AMsystemrole assigned best fit{"role":"SPM","PM_score":21,"SPM_score":24}
- 9/29/2026, 11:29:36 AMsystemcv ingested{"file":"30_aman_borkar.pdf","role":"AUTO","redactions":{"name":23,"email":1,"phone":2,"profile_url":1},"name_detected":true}