Ravi Shankar
Why they fit
No criterion reached a clear-evidence score (3/5 or higher) on the PM rubric.
Where they fall short
- Problem -> Change -> Result −20 pts
The CV shows delivery of regulatory compliance features on schedule, but does not identify a specific problem or friction that the candidate noticed and resolved to create an operational or product improvement.
- Evidence-Led Decisions −20 pts
There is no evidence in the CV of decisions being changed, stopped, or prioritised based on data, customer feedback, or post-mortems.
- Builds Repeatable Ways of Working −16 pts
The candidate maintained an existing product requirements wiki, but there is no evidence of creating a new tool, template, or operating framework that was adopted or reused by others.
| Criterion | Weight | Score | Weighted | AI reasoning | Evidence from CV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Independent Decision Ownership | 30% | 0/5 | 0.0/30 | The CV provides no evidence of independent decision ownership. Instead, it explicitly notes that all decisions are reviewed in monthly roadmap forums and undergo a 6–8 week approval process before build begins. | Evidence not present in the CV. |
| Problem -> Change -> Business/Operational Result | 20% | 1/5 | 4.0/20 | The candidate provides evidence of shipping regulatory features on time, but tracks delivery outputs rather than connecting a defined operational or customer problem to quantifiable business outcomes such as cost, revenue, adoption, or reliability. |
|
| Evidence-Led Prioritisation and Reversal | 20% | 0/5 | 0.0/20 | There is no evidence in the CV of using data or evidence to drive prioritisation, stop initiatives, or alter an earlier product direction. | Evidence not present in the CV. |
| Creates Systems Others Run | 15% | 1/5 | 3.0/15 | The candidate maintained an existing product requirements wiki, which provides weak participation evidence, but there is no evidence of creating a new framework, operating rhythm, or system that others adopted and ran. |
|
| Multi-Party Resolution Under Pressure | 15% | 1/5 | 3.0/15 | The CV shows routine cross-functional stakeholder coordination across bank implementations, but lacks any evidence of managing escalations, high-pressure conflict, incident post-mortems, or navigating ambiguous failures. |
|
| Total | 100% | 10 | The candidate demonstrates execution and project coordination skills within an enterprise banking environment with a focus on compliance delivery. However, the CV lacks evidence across all Senior Product Manager rubric criteria, showing no independent decision ownership, no evidence-led reversals, and no demonstrated impact on operational or business metrics. | ||
Scoring scale
- 0: No evidence in the CV
- 1: Indirect or participation-only evidence
- 2: Partial: some elements of the description, weak link to outcome
- 3: One clear example matching the description
- 4: Clear example with a visible result, candidate's own action linked to it
- 5: Repeated, strong examples fully matching the description, with results
Weighted contribution = score ÷ 5 × weight. Every quote is checked against the CV text; if none can be verified, the score is capped at 1.
Evidence
- “Shipped 6 compliance and regulatory features aligned to RBI guidelines over 3 years; all delivered on schedule for regulatory deadline” · Problem -> Change -> Result
- “Maintained the product requirements wiki — documentation quality audited at 95% in internal review” · Builds Repeatable Ways of Working
- “Managed roadmap planning across 3 concurrent bank implementations; coordinated stakeholder reviews across compliance, IT, and business teams at each bank” · Carries Ambiguous Problems Through to Closure
- Shipped 6 compliance and regulatory features aligned to RBI guidelines over 3 years, all on schedule for regulatory deadlines
- Managed roadmap planning across 3 concurrent bank implementations
- Wrote functional specifications for 4 payment gateway integrations with sign-off from bank clients' IT teams
- Maintained product requirements wiki with documentation quality audited at 95% in internal review
Anonymised CV (exactly what the AI saw)
[CANDIDATE] [EMAIL REDACTED] [PHONE REDACTED] · Chennai [PROFILE URL REDACTED] Professional Summary Product Manager with 4 years in banking technology and financial services SaaS. Strong in regulated product environments, compliance-first development, and multi-stakeholder alignment in large organisations. MBA from IIM Trichy. Currently exploring opportunities outside financial services to apply structured product thinking to a different domain. Work Experience Product Manager – Core Banking Platforms FIS India (Financial Technology, 2000+ employees), Chennai · Aug 2021 – Present — PM for the corporate payments and trade finance module — used by 8 private sector bank clients in India — Shipped 6 compliance and regulatory features aligned to RBI guidelines over 3 years; all delivered on schedule for regulatory deadline — Managed roadmap planning across 3 concurrent bank implementations; coordinated stakeholder reviews across compliance, IT, and business teams at each bank — Works within a 12-person PM organisation at FIS India; reports to Product Director; all decisions reviewed in monthly roadmap forums — Strong at planning, documentation, and compliance; decision cycles typically 6–8 weeks from idea to approval before build begins Associate Product Manager FIS India, Chennai · Aug 2019 – Jul 2021 — Supported PM on the SWIFT messaging and correspondent banking module — Wrote functional specifications for 4 payment gateway integrations; coordinated with bank clients' IT teams for requirements sign-off — Maintained the product requirements wiki — documentation quality audited at 95% in internal review Education MBA, Finance & Operations · IIM Tiruchirappalli · 2017–2019 B.Tech, Electronics Engineering · NIT Trichy · 2013–2017 · CGPA 8.1/10 Skills & Certifications Product management · Banking & trade finance · SWIFT · Regulatory compliance · JIRA · Confluence · SQL · Visio SAFe 5 Product Owner/PM (2021) · Agile Scrum Master – Simplilearn (2020)
Interview brief
Briefs are written when you shortlist a candidate.
Email draft
An offer or rejection draft is prepared once you make a decision. Nothing is ever sent without your approval.
Audit trail (2)
- 9/29/2026, 11:02:38 AMsystemanalysis completed{"PM_score":13,"SPM_score":10}
- 9/29/2026, 11:01:28 AMsystemcv ingested{"file":"pm_14_ravi_shankar.pdf","role":"PM","redactions":{"name":1,"email":1,"phone":1,"profile_url":1},"name_detected":true}